1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 360 S.E.2d
  5. 360 S.E.2d 467 (1987)
 

MARTIN v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE

No. 8728SC145.

360 S.E.2d 467 (1987)

87 N.C. App. 272

Douglas Dean MARTIN v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

October 6, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gum, Hillier and McDaniels, P.A. by Howard Gum, and Carter & Kropelnicki, P.A. by Steven Kropelnicki, Jr., Asheville, for plaintiff-appellant.

Brock & Drye, P.A. by Floyd D. Brock, Asheville, for defendant-appellee.

WELLS, Judge.

The question presented is whether the trial court's order of summary judgment in favor of defendant was proper. It is elementary that summary judgment is appropriate only where the pleadings and discovery materials leave unresolved no genuine issue of material fact. Our Supreme Court has held:

A defendant is entitled to summary judgment only if he can produce a forecast of evidence which, when viewed most favorably to plaintiff, would, "if offered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases