1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 129 A.D.2d
  5. 129 A.D.2d 698 (1987)
 

WEISSE v. KAMHI

129 A.D.2d 698 (1987)

Theodore H. Weisse, Respondent, v. Edouard Kamhi et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 20, 1987

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Because the plaintiff's motion was based, in part, upon evidence which had not been before the court at the time of the original motion, it was a motion to renew (see, Wile v Wile, 100 A.D.2d 932, 934). Although leave to renew should generally be denied where the movant fails to offer a reasonable excuse for the failure to submit the additional facts on the original motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases