COTTERMAN v. CLEVELAND ELEC. ILLUM. CO.

No. 86-1679.

34 Ohio St. 3d 48 (1987)

COTTERMAN, APPELLANT, v. CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO., APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 23, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dworken & Bernstein Co., L.P.A., Patrick J. Perotti and Marvin P. Dworken, for appellant.

Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Richard Gurbst and Frank A. DiPiero, for appellee.


HOLMES, J.

The primary issue raised upon appeal is whether, under the facts presented in the case here, appellant's motion for prejudgment interest is barred by the passing of time. Because we are in agreement with the reasoning of the court of appeals and for the reasons expressed herein, we affirm the judgments below.

R.C. 1343.03(C) provides for interest on a judgment as follows:

"Interest on a judgment, decree, or order for the payment of money...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases