Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.
The appellant contends that the counterclaim which it asserted in its amended verified answer states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for abuse of process. Even presuming that the appellant's allegations are true, as we must on a motion to dismiss (see, Curiano v Suozzi,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.