1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 666 F.Supp.
  5. 666 F.Supp. 140 (1987)
 

PORTNOY v. STANDARD-PACIFIC CORP.

No. 86 C 0653.

666 F.Supp. 140 (1987)

Leo P. PORTNOY, Plaintiff, v. STANDARD-PACIFIC CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and William H. Langenberg, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

June 29, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerrold M. Shapiro, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Jeffrey C. Briggs, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, Cal., Robert T. Isham, Jr., James Burns, Isham, Lincoln & Beale, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Presently before the Court is the motion of plaintiff Leo P. Portnoy to recover attorneys' fees from defendant Standard-Pacific Corporation ("SPC") in conjunction with his shareholders' derivative suit under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b) (1982).1 For the following reasons, the Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases