PEOPLE v. PETERSON


126 A.D.2d 680 (1987)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carl Peterson, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

January 20, 1987


Ordered that the judgments are modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by providing that all of the sentences shall run concurrently. As so modified, the judgments are affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, there was no requirement that the Trial Judge be disqualified from presiding over the trial (see, People v Tartaglia, 35 N.Y.2d 918, 919; People ex rel. Stickle v Fay, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases