1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 357 S.E.2d
  5. 357 S.E.2d 444 (1987)
 

HUNT v. HUNT

No. 8610SC892.

357 S.E.2d 444 (1987)

George R. HUNT v. Charles J. HUNT and Amelia P. Hunt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 7, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jernigan & Maxfield by John A. Maxfield and Leonard T. Jernigan, Jr., Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.

Young, Moore, Henderson & Alvis by David P. Sousa and Ralph W. Meekins, Raleigh, for defendants-appellees.

PHILLIPS, Judge.

The foregoing materials when viewed in the light most favorable to the non-movant plaintiff, as our law requires, Durham v. Vine, 40 N.C. App. 564, 253 S.E.2d 316 (1979), tend to show that defendants' dog was running loose with their consent when it bit plaintiff and that they had knowledge that the dog had tried to bite other persons on two prior occasions. Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases