CRANDALL v. WALDBAUM, INC.


129 A.D.2d 672 (1987)

Amelia Crandall et al., Appellants, v. Waldbaum, Inc., Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 20, 1987


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs' contentions, the defendant's motion for summary judgment was not untimely so as to require its denial, even though it was made on the eve of trial, since the motion was clearly meritorious and, under CPLR 3212 (a), it could be made at any time after issue had been joined (see, Kule Resources v Reliance Group, 49 N.Y.2d 587; Carvel Corp....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases