XEROX CORP. v. OAKLAND CTY.

Docket No. 81086.

157 Mich. App. 640 (1987)

403 N.W.2d 188

XEROX CORPORATION v. OAKLAND COUNTY

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided February 17, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Van Til, Kasiborski & Ronayne, P.C. (by Lawrence R. Van Til and John R. Ronayne III), for Xerox Corporation.

Shifman, Goodman & Carlson, P.C. (by Burton R. Shifman and John A. Carlson), for Oakland County.

Daniel A. Ophoff, Assistant City Attorney, for the City of Grand Rapids.

Before: MacKENZIE, P.J., and ALLEN and G.W. CROCKETT, III, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals as of right from the Michigan Tax Tribunal's December 12, 1983, opinion and partial judgment and August 3, 1984, order of summary judgment, in favor of respondents. The tribunal consolidated numerous cases which were heard on the issue of the valuation methodology to be used for the 1980, 1981 and 1982 tax years to determine the true cash value of the twenty-six models of leased copier and duplicator machines that are located in respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases