Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The hearing court did not err in denying so much of the defendant's pretrial motion as sought suppression of the oral statements made by the defendant during his prearraignment detention and after his indelible right to counsel had attached, as the evidence adduced at the suppression hearing supports the hearing court's determination that those statements were either spontaneous (see, People v Rivers,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.