1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 133 A.D.2d
  5. 133 A.D.2d 656 (1987)
 

PEOPLE v. YOUNG

133 A.D.2d 656 (1987)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joe Young, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 5, 1987

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the complainant's identification testimony should have been suppressed due to the alleged suggestiveness of the photographic identification procedures is without merit. We agree with the hearing court's determination that the People clearly established an independent basis for both the in-court and lineup identifications (see, People v Adams, 53 N.Y.2d 241

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases