SIKKING v. SELECTED RISKS INS. CO.


217 N.J. Super. 569 (1987)

526 A.2d 713

LINDA C. SIKKING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SELECTED RISKS INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 30, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Capizola, Fineman & Kutner, attorneys for appellant (Darrell Fineman and Barbara Lapham, on the brief).

Horuvitz, Perlow, Morris & Baker, attorneys for respondent (John P. Morris, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, HAVEY and MUIR.


PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Kleiner published at 210 N.J.Super. 229 (Law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases