BAHR v. CITY OF LITCHFIELD

No. C9-86-1757.

404 N.W.2d 381 (1987)

Eugene BAHR, et al., petitioners, Appellants, v. CITY OF LITCHFIELD, et al., Charles Schrum, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted June 26, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Schaps, Litchfield, for appellants.

Steven E. Drange, Litchfield, Ronald C. Anderson, Willmar, for respondents.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc, consisting of POPOVICH, C.J., and PARKER, WOZNIAK, SEDGWICK, LANSING, HUSPENI, LESLIE, NIERENGARTEN, RANDALL, CRIPPEN, STONE, and MULALLY, JJ.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Eugene Bahr and George Frelander appeal from the judgment entered in district court dismissing their petition for declaratory judgment, writ of certiorari and writ of mandamus. Their petition seeks review of the procedures used by the Litchfield Police Civil Service Commission and the City of Litchfield to fill two sergeant positions in the Litchfield Police Department. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

In April 1983...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases