CRESSWELL v. PRUDENTIAL-BACHE SECURITIES, INC.

No. 83 Civ. 2099.

675 F.Supp. 106 (1987)

Edward CRESSWELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PRUDENTIAL-BACHE SECURITIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

November 23, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G.G. Chaplin, pro se.

Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City (John Hardiman, Marvin Schwartz, Pressly M. Millen, of counsel), for defendant.


OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. ("Bache") has moved for an order (1) granting Bache leave to pay the sum of $51,128.91 into the court pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 67 and (2) dismissing the remaining claims in this litigation pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) because a justiciable case or controversy no longer exists with respect to them. Plaintiff pro se George Gough Chaplin ("Chaplin") opposes the motion on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases