1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 46 Wn.
  5. 46 Wn. App. 734 (1987)
 

THAYER v. KING COUNTY

No. 15582-2-I.

46 Wn. App. 734 (1987)

731 P.2d 1167

THEODORE N. THAYER, ET AL, Appellants, v. KING COUNTY, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

February 2, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack Alexander Borland and Ferrell, Wade & Borland, for appellants.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and James L. Brewer, Deputy, for respondent King County.

William Williams, for respondents Knowles.

Laurence Mosler, for respondents Mac-Rent, et al.

Richard C. Reed and Reed, McClure, Moceri, Thonn & Moriarty, for respondent King County Water District.

Brian Putra, for respondent Expert Drywall.

GROSSE, J.

This matter presents a single issue for review: Whether King County properly followed the statutory procedure for vacation of roads contained in RCW 36.87?

The facts are not in dispute. At one time all of 130th Avenue N.E. in Woodinville was a county road. When State Route 522 was completed, 130th Avenue N.E. became a dead-end road. Local landowners (appellants not included) petitioned the County on September 7, 1976 to vacate a portion of the road...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases