Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the hearing court improperly denied his motion to suppress the complainant's proposed identification testimony. We disagree. The People met their burden of going forward to establish the reasonableness of the police conduct and the lack of suggestiveness of the procedures used and the defendant did not then prove that the photographic identification procedures were unduly suggestive (see,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.