Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The record clearly establishes that the undercover police officer's viewing of the defendant at the time of his arrest by another police officer occurred five minutes after the drug transaction and was made for the purpose of confirming that the right person had been arrested in this "buy-and-bust" operation. Thus, the viewing was not a police-arranged identification procedure, and no Wade hearing was required (see...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
