ZOLLER v. TRANSAMERICA INS. CO.


215 N.J. Super. 552 (1987)

522 A.2d 479

ERWIN H. ZOLLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND THE ADLER AGENCY, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 9, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard H. Thiele argued the cause for appellant (Thiele & Hermes, attorneys; Richard H. Thiele on the brief and reply brief).

Joseph E. Kelley argued the cause for respondent (Haggerty & Donohue, attorneys, Robert J. Reilly, III on the brief).

Before Judges KING, DEIGHAN and HAVEY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by HAVEY, J.A.D.

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether an insured is entitled to recover income continuation benefits under his no-fault automobile insurance policy and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4b when an automobile-related injury, combined with the availability of early retirement benefits, motivates him to retire, resulting in a loss of income. We conclude that an insured is not entitled to benefits unless there is objective...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases