MULTARI v. CAR PHONE


137 Misc.2d 626 (1987)

Salvatore Multari, Appellant, v. Westchester Car Phone, Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

December 1, 1987


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew Romano for appellant. Lehrman, Kronick & Lehrman (Arnold S. Kronick of counsel), for respondent.

DIPAOLA, P. J., GEILER and WIDLITZ, JJ., concur.


MEMORANDUM.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and matter remanded to the court below for determination de novo upon a hearing.

Under the circumstances, the lower court should have held a hearing to determine whether service was proper. At said hearing such issues as the place of tenant's principal office or principal place of business and the date of the mailing of process to tenant can be more fully developed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases