Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Although the defendant was the subject of two suggestive pretrial identification procedures, the trial court properly permitted the complainants to identify the defendant at trial as there were clearly independent bases therefor. Furthermore, a review of the record indicates that the evidence amply supports the jury's verdict. The defendant was identified by both complainants who testified that the defendant and another man robbed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.