Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his guilt was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt because of inconsistencies in the testimony of the People's witnesses. It is well settled that minor discrepancies between the testimony of witnesses is not sufficient to show that the testimony of one or more of the witnesses is incredible as a matter of law (see, People v Di Girolamo,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.