HOENIG v. STETEFELDT


127 A.D.2d 632 (1987)

Harold Hoenig, Appellant, v. John Stetefeldt et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 9, 1987


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondents except for Kanaje Corporation.

The Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion to restore the case to the Trial Calendar. This was the second time the action was stricken from the calendar on the plaintiff's default in appearance and counsel admittedly did not even check on the status of the case until more than a year after the second time it was marked off. No reasonable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases