GLORIA v. PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

No. 2 CA-CV 87-0203.

155 Ariz. 596 (1987)

748 P.2d 1220

Daniel GLORIA, Appellant, v. PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and the Honorable William Scholl; Tucson City Court and the Honorable Thomas Martin, a Magistrate thereof, Respondents; and City Attorney's Office, a Real Party in Interest, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

Redesignated as Opinion and Publication Ordered January 18, 1988.

Reconsideration Denied January 18, 1988.

Review Denied May 3, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen Paul Barnard, Tucson, for petitioner/appellant.

Frederick S. Dean, City Atty. by M.J. Raciti, Tucson, for respondents/appellees and real party in interest.


OPINION*

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

Appellant Daniel Gloria, an attorney, was arrested for allegedly violating A.R.S. § 28-692(A), driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The only issue on appeal is whether the police officers prevented appellant from communicating with his attorney in private.

After appellant was arrested, he was taken to the police station and read his Miranda rights...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases