BLANKENSHIP v. SCHWARTZ


127 A.D.2d 624 (1987)

John G. Blankenship et al., Respondents, v. Robert B. Schwartz, Defendant, and Ronald DeMeo et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 9, 1987


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Based upon the record before us, we conclude that the appellants failed to demonstrate that "unusual or unanticipated circumstances" developed subsequent to the filing of the note of issue and certificate of readiness, thereby warranting additional pretrial proceedings (see, Chaloupka v Neil's Plumbing & Heating, 114 A.D.2d 833, 834; Di Maria v Coordinated Ranches...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases