Plaintiff appeals from an order that dismissed "all proceedings on plaintiff's motions and allegations and garnishees' answers on oath." That order was the result of a hearing held on January 13, 1986. Because plaintiff has failed to provide us with a transcript of that hearing, we are unable to review the merits of her assignments of error. See Reeder v. Kay,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SHLIM v. CHARAPATA, INC.
734 P.2d 12 (1987)
84 Or.App. 423
Sylvia L. SHLIM, Appellant, v. CHARAPATA, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Defendant, and Cml, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, and Michael Mills, Respondents.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted November 21, 1986.
Decided March 18, 1987.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
John H. Heald, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Zikes, Kayser, Freed, Smith & Heald, P.C., Portland.
Michael D. Mills, Salem, waived appearance for respondent CML, Inc.
Edward L. Clark, Jr., Salem, waived appearance for respondent Mills.
Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.