PAUL v. PAUL

Nos. C6-87-169, CX-87-532.

410 N.W.2d 329 (1987)

In re the Marriage of David J. PAUL, petitioner, Respondent, v. Elizabeth M. PAUL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 4, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terry A. Karkela, Karkela Law Office, Perham, for respondent.

Peter M. Irvine, Irvine, Ramstad, Quam, Briggs & Irvine, P.A., Perham, for appellant.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and NORTON and MULALLY, JJ., with oral argument waived.


OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Husband and wife both appeal from an amended judgment and decree. She claims the trial court awarded the husband an inequitably excessive share of the parties' marital property and should have awarded her permanent spousal maintenance. He asserts the property was divided inequitably in the wife's favor and the court's award of temporary spousal maintenance was not an abuse of discretion. We affirm.

FACTS

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases