DWORKIN v. DWORKIN


217 N.J. Super. 518 (1987)

526 A.2d 278

YVONNE DWORKIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HOWARD DWORKIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 21, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Betsy Rosenbloom argued the cause for appellant (Fox and Fox, attorneys; Arthur D. Grossman, of counsel; Betsy Rosenbloom, on the brief).

S. Philip Klein argued the cause for respondent (Ozzard, Rizzolo, Klein, Mauro, Savo & Hogan, attorneys; S. Philip Klein and Arthur D. Fialk, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, BAIME and ASHBEY.


The opinion of the Court was delivered by ASHBEY, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Yvonne Dworkin and defendant Howard Dworkin were divorced by judgment dated January 30, 1986. Their property settlement agreement, dated January 21, 1986, was incorporated in the judgment. Following its entry, defendant moved for an order requiring plaintiff to convey to him her interest in the parties' St. Maarten condominium pursuant to the terms of the agreement. Plaintiff cross-moved for an order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases