GOLDMAN v. JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORP.

No. 86-1470.

33 Ohio St. 3d 40 (1987)

GOLDMAN, EXECUTRIX, APPELLEE, v. JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORP. ET AL.; OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 14, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gallon, Kalniz & Iorio Co., L.P.A., and David W. Zoll, for appellee.

Fuller & Henry and Robert A. Bunda, for appellants Owens-Illinois, Inc. et al.

Frutig, Polito & Travis Co., L.P.A., and Thomas R. Frutig, for appellants Keene Corp. et al.

Hesser, Armstrong & Disantis, and Richard J. Disantis, for appellant Raymark Industries, Inc.

Arter & Hadden, John D. Maddox, and Irene C. Keyse-Walker, for appellant Combustion Engineering, Inc.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease and Russell P. Herrold, Jr., urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Manufacturers' Assn.


WOLFF, J.

In this case we are asked to decide whether the theory of alternative liability, as recognized by this court in Minnich v. Ashland Oil Co. (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 396, 15 OBR 511, 473 N.E.2d 1199, is applicable to the facts of this case. If it is not, we then must decide whether we should recognize as a theory of recovery in this case the market-share theory of liability, as first espoused in Sindell...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases