PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS


135 A.D.2d 593 (1987)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carl Williams, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 7, 1987


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant claims that the Trial Judge erred by permitting the complainant to "bolster" his testimony by stating that he had received training in observation. "However, this was not impermissible `bolstering', but, rather, was information which the jury could consider in their evaluation of his testimony" (People v Williams, 109 A.D.2d 906, 908).

We have considered the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases