STATE v. FEEHAN

No. C4-86-1827.

412 N.W.2d 309 (1987)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. James Paul FEEHAN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied November 12, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, State Atty. Gen., St. Paul, John R. Leitner, Aitkin Co. Atty., Aitkin, for respondent.

Samuel A. McCloud, Dean S. Grau, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J. and FOLEY and HUSPENI, JJ.


OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

James Paul Feehan appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding him guilty of working in protected waters without a permit in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 105.41 and 105.42 (1984). On appeal, he raises a number of issues relating to admission of evidence at trial. He also contends that section 105.42 is unconstitutionally vague. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

FACTS

This...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases