FRYSINGER v. LEECH

No. 86-593.

32 Ohio St. 3d 38 (1987)

FRYSINGER, APPELLANT, v. LEECH, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 12, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl G. McMahon and Rodney M. Arthur, for appellant.

Gooding, Evans & Huffman, Lawrence S. Huffman and Matthew C. Huffman, for appellee.


MARKUS, J.

The physician contends: (1) a malpractice action accrues upon the patient's discovery of the malpractice injury, despite the later termination of the professional relationship, and (2) a Civ. R. 41(A)(1) dismissal precludes a plaintiff's reliance on R.C. 2305.19 to eliminate the limitations bar. We reject both those contentions, reverse the dismissal judgment, and remand the cause for further proceedings.

I

R.C. 2305.11(A) established...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases