1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 133 A.D.2d
  5. 133 A.D.2d 569 (1987)
 

MURRAY v. STATE LIQUOR AUTH.

133 A.D.2d 569 (1987)

Mary A. Murray, Respondent, v. State Liquor Authority et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 15, 1987

We agree with the motion court's determination that rule 36 (t) of the Rules of the State Liquor Authority (9 NYCRR 53.1 [t]) represents an unauthorized and invalid exercise by the Authority of its rule-making power, since nowhere in the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, which contains specific and particularized grants of authority to promulgate rules with respect to certain subjects (Rotunno v City of Rochester, 120 A.D.2d 160, 163...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases