INWOOD OWNERS, INC. v. LITTLE FALLS TP.


216 N.J. Super. 485 (1987)

524 A.2d 441

INWOOD OWNERS, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF LITTLE FALLS, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 2, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James V. Segreto argued the cause for appellant (Segreto & Segreto, attorneys; James V. Segreto of counsel, David R. Bruins on the brief).

Steven Muhlstock argued the cause for respondent (Gittleman, Muhlstock & Meyers, attorneys; Steven Muhlstock and Brian Chewkaskie on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, GAYNOR and SCALERA.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PETRELLA, P.J.A.D.

The Township of Little Falls (Township) appeals from the judgment of the Tax Court which held void and invalid an increase in the tax assessment of a cooperative apartment complex owned by Inwood Owners, Inc. (Inwood). On or about November 1, 1985 the tax assessor attempted to increase Inwood's assessment by imposing omitted assessments for the tax years 1984 and 1985, evidentially based on the fact that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases