HEINTZ v. AKBAR

Docket No. 88260.

161 Mich. App. 533 (1987)

411 N.W.2d 736

HEINTZ v. AKBAR

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided April 30, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

House & Schrope (by Brian R. Schrope), for plaintiffs.

Fordney, Cady, Rusch & Prine, P.C. (by Andrew W. Prine), for defendants.

Before: MacKENZIE, P.J., and BEASLEY and E.A. QUINNELL, JJ.


BEASLEY, J.

Defendants, J.U. Akbar, M.D., and Pigeon Clinic, P.C., appeal as of right from a jury award of $85,000 to plaintiffs, Mary Margaret Heintz and Michael Heintz. For ease of discussion, we will refer only to plaintiff Mary Margaret Heintz and to defendant Dr. Akbar.

Plaintiff alleged that Dr. Akbar, an employee of the Pigeon Clinic, committed medical malpractice in performing a midline episiotomy on her during the delivery of her first child. A midline...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases