Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent Pomirchy, payable by the appellants.
Under the circumstances of this case, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in directing discovery and inspection of the items in question (see, Homburger v Levitin,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.