HOMBURGER v. LEVITIN


127 A.D.2d 565 (1987)

Hans Homburger, Respondent, v. Lazar Levitin et al., Appellants, and Semyon Pomirchy, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) Semyon Pomirchy, Respondent, v. Lazar Levitin et al., Appellants, and Hans Homburger, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 2, 1987


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent Pomirchy, payable by the appellants.

Under the circumstances of this case, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in directing discovery and inspection of the items in question (see, Homburger v Levitin, 114 A.D.2d 885

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases