Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Since the defendant neither objected to the trial court's circumstantial evidence charge nor requested any further instruction with respect to the evaluation of circumstantial evidence, his claim that the charge was erroneous has not been preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hoke,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.