FOGEL v. LENOX HILL HOSP.


127 A.D.2d 548 (1987)

Albert Fogel, Appellant, v. Lenox Hill Hospital et al., Defendants, and Nordic Interiors, Inc., Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Adco Electrical Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 26, 1987


At the outset, we note our disapproval of the practice employed by the Trial Justice in delivering his charge to the jury by means of a tape-recording device. There are various dangers inherent in such procedure, including that of jurors failing to accord the same level of attentiveness to a recording as to the Judge speaking first hand, and Trial Judges are cautioned against so proceeding in the future.

Notwithstanding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases