Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
At the trial, the prosecutor improperly questioned the defendant during cross-examination regarding prior statements he had allegedly made to the police when he was arrested, without providing prior notice of his intention to do so pursuant to CPL 710.30 (1) (a). He also improperly cross-examined the defendant regarding the circumstances surrounding a prior crime to which the defendant had pleaded guilty, in violation of the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.