NEUMAN v. DEMMER

No. C8-87-674.

414 N.W.2d 240 (1987)

Charles NEUMAN, et al., Appellants, v. Alan DEMMER, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied January 15, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth R. Moen, Dunlap, Keith, Finseth, et al., Rochester, for appellants.

Karl L. Cambronne, Chestnut and Brooks, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondents.

Heard, considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., and MULALLY and LOMMEN, JJ.


OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment filed January 12, 1987, in which the trial court ruled that a promissory note did not survive the cancellation of a contract for deed. Both parties had previously brought summary judgment motions, which were denied on the grounds that a material fact was in issue: whether the parties intended the note to substitute as cash and as a present payment or whether the note represented a promise of future...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases