FRAMINGHAM ACCEPTANCE v. STATE BD OF EQUALIZATION

Docket No. A034744.

191 Cal.App.3d 461 (1987)

236 Cal. Rptr. 771

FRAMINGHAM ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

April 9, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

V. James Jackl and Belzer, Jackl, Katzen, Hulchiy, Murray & Balamuth for Plaintiff and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Timothy G. Laddish and Richard F. Finn, Deputy Attorneys General for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

ANDERSON, P.J.

Following an adverse determination by the State Board of Equalization (respondent or the Board), the Framingham Acceptance Corporation (appellant) brought an action under Revenue and Taxation Code1 section 6933 to recover sales taxes paid under protest. The case went to trial on stipulated facts which are as follows: appellant leased equipment that it had purchased "tax paid" (&...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases