BELL v. ELCO CORP.


137 Misc.2d 502 (1987)

Mary Bell, Plaintiff, v. Elco Corporation, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Onondaga County.

October 27, 1987


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hiscock & Barclay (Richard K. Hughes of counsel), for defendant. Scolaro, Shulman, Cohen, Lawler & Burstein, P. C. (Ted H. Williams of counsel), for plaintiff.


THOMAS J. MURPHY, J.

This is a statutory cause of action to recover damages on account of the defendant's alleged publication and dissemination of a written document in violation of section 394-e of the New York General Business Law. The action arises out of the alleged receipt of an Elco "Explanation of Benefits — Medical" form by John Bell the separated husband of the plaintiff concerning medical benefits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases