1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 106 N.J.
  5. 106 N.J. 529 (1987)
 

MATTER OF WARHAFTIG

106 N.J. 529 (1987)

524 A.2d 398

IN THE MATTER OF ARNOLD M. WARHAFTIG, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 21, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robyn M. Hill, Deputy Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

Joseph A. Hayden, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Hayden and Perle, attorneys; Richard F.X. Regan, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

In this disciplinary proceeding, arising out of a presentment filed by the District XII Ethics Committee, respondent is charged with invading trust account funds by withdrawing anticipated legal fees in advance of real-estate closings. The Disciplinary Review Board (DRB or Board) concluded that respondent had engaged in unethical conduct, but that knowing misappropriation had not been established by clear and convincing evidence. The Board therefore recommended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases