STACKER & RAVICH v. SIMON

No. C0-86-2036.

411 N.W.2d 217 (1987)

STACKER & RAVICH, Respondent, v. Ronald L. SIMON, Appellant, Glenn R. Ayres, et al., Counterclaim Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied November 13, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerry W. Snider, Joseph H. Otterstetter, Faegre & Benson, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Jerome B. Simon, Maun, Green, Hayes, Simon, Johanneson and Brehl, St. Paul, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and WOZNIAK and CRIPPEN, JJ.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

This action was commenced following appellant Ronald Simon's withdrawal from the Stacker, Ravich and Simon law partnership, which continued in business as the Stacker and Ravich partnership. There was no written partnership agreement. Therefore, the trial court was called upon to resolve several matters relating to the financial consequences of the withdrawal. Simon asserts that the trial court's allocation of fees from two clients...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases