SUTTLES v. VOGEL

No. 4-86-0126.

160 Ill. App.3d 464 (1987)

513 N.E.2d 563

NORMAN L. SUTTLES et al., Counterplaintiffs and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PETER J. VOGEL et al., Counterdefendants-Appellants (Jim G. Dawdy et al., Counterdefendants; W. Thomas Ryder, Third-Party Defendant; Leo F. Carroll et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees).

Appellate Court of Illinois — Fourth District.

Rehearing denied October 9, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Duane D. Young, of Long, Dvorak, Rabin & Young, Ltd., of Springfield, and Paul J. Bargiel, P.C., of Chicago, for appellants.

James R. Morrison and Karen Steele, both of Westervelt, Johnson, Nicoll & Keller, of Peoria, for appellees Leo F. Carroll and Flynn & Flynn.

Steven Mottaz, of Thomas, Mottaz, Eastman & Sherwood, of Alton, for appellees Norman L. Suttles and Lula Mae Suttles.


Orders affirmed.

JUSTICE LUND delivered the opinion of the court:

Peter J. Vogel and Gerda L. Vogel (the Vogels), counterdefendants, appeal following the denial of a motion to vacate a default judgment entered on July 17, 1985, against them and in favor of Norman L. Suttles and Lula M. Suttles (the Suttles), counterplaintiffs. The default judgment for $600,000 was entered against the Vogels, as a sanction, for failure to comply with discovery orders.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases