Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that he was denied his right to a fair trial by the trial court's failure to give a limiting instruction to the jury on the permissible scope of rebuttal testimony (which testimony revealed the defendant's custodial statement) was not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Rosado,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.