PER CURIAM.
Reversed. Because we believe the appellant established a prima facie case as to appellees' liability on the guaranties sued upon, we conclude that it was error for the trial court to dismiss appellant's claim. Among the evidence presented by appellant was a testimonial admission by one of the appellees that he had personally guaranteed the leases in question. In addition, there was circumstantial evidence presented showing which lease was secured by each...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
