HIRSCH v. HIRSCH


134 A.D.2d 485 (1987)

Freda Hirsch, Appellant, v. Jack Hirsch et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 23, 1987


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find that the Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the plaintiff's cross motion to vacate her default in view of the fact that she failed to submit an affidavit of merit or documentary evidence to substantiate her claim of fraud. The affirmation submitted by the plaintiff's counsel in support of the cross motion merely incorporated and reiterated the allegations of the complaint. Moreover, apart from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases