STATE v. WHITNEY

No. 53204-4.

108 Wn.2d 506 (1987)

739 P.2d 1150

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ALFRED WILLIAM WHITNEY, Petitioner.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 23, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott J. Engelhard of Washington Appellate Defender Association, for petitioner.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Barbara B. Linde, Deputy, for respondent.


GOODLOE, J.

We address whether jury unanimity on one of the two alternative means charged is necessary in a first degree rape conviction. The Court of Appeals held jury unanimity is not necessary if each charged alternative is supported by substantial evidence. State v. Whitney, 44 Wn.App. 17, 720 P.2d 853 (1986). We affirm.

The relevant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases