1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 49 Wn.
  5. 49 Wn. App. 564 (1987)
 

BROTEN v. MAY

No. 15044-8-I.

49 Wn. App. 564 (1987)

744 P.2d 1085

ROBERT BROTEN, Appellant, v. STERLING W. MAY, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

October 26, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reed P. Schifferman, Frankie A. Crain, and Williams, Lanza, Kastner & Gibbs, for appellant.

William R. Hickman and Reed, McClure, Moceri, Thonn & Moriarty, for respondents May.

Stephen G. Palken, Orly J. Sorrel, and Sorrel & Palken, for respondents McDermott Group.

DURHAM, J.*

At the close of Robert Broten's case, the trial court dismissed his claims against The McDermott Group, Inc. (McDermott) for tortious interference with a contractual relationship and for violation of the Consumer Protection Act. At the same time the trial court dismissed McDermott's counterclaim against Broten for violation of the Consumer Protection Act. After subsequent hearings, the trial court held that McDermott was liable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases