1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 517 So.2d
  5. 517 So.2d 88 (1987)
 

LITMAN v. FINE, JACOBSON, SCHWARTZ, ET AL.

No. 86-2822.

517 So.2d 88 (1987)

Bernard LITMAN, Appellant, v. FINE, JACOBSON, SCHWARTZ, NASH, BLOCK & ENGLAND, P.A., Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 22, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lapidus & Frankel and Richard L. Lapidus, Miami, for appellant.

Fine Jacobson Schwartz Nash Block & England and Arthur J. England, Jr. and Theodore Klein and Charles M. Auslander, Miami, for appellee.

Before DANIEL S. PEARSON, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.

We affirm the final judgment entered for the law firm of Fine Jacobson Schwartz Nash Block & England, P.A. (Fine Jacobson). In so doing, we reject Litman's two contentions: that the attorneys were not entitled to a charging lien for fees for services rendered in their successful representation of him in the underlying case, and that he was deprived of a jury trial when the trial court determined that the attorneys were entitled to a judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases